Boundary probe: personal agent runtimes (not in the grid)
Most Popular Self-Hosted Personal AI Agents
This is a boundary probe, not a category ranking: it asks about self-hosted personal agent runtimes, which barely overlap with coding agents (entity crossover with the category question is 0.0% in Chinese and 2.9% in English). Chinese-side completeness is 76.7%, so read it with that discount.
Measured 2026-09-22 · 12-seat model panel · 10 scenarios · methodology #2 v2026-09-22.1
Share
WeChat: save the image and long-press the QR code in a chat.
The sample behind this cell
- Valid samples / calls expected
- 174 / 180
- Completeness
- 96.7%
- Effective entities (effN)
- 28.0
- Entities mentioned at least once
- 110
How this cell was asked
This cell used 5 phrasings, each asked 3 times. Every call asked for the ten names only — no reasons, no scores.
- Most Popular Self-Hosted Personal AI Agents
- Self-hosted personal AI agents that live in a chat app — what are the options?
- I want a personal AI agent running on my own machine that handles messages and everyday tasks. Which open-source projects should I look at?
- self hosted personal ai agent open source
- List some open-source personal AI agent runtimes that people self-host.
Where this page stops
- This is one measurement, not a trend line. The next run of the same phrasings comes next quarter.
- Each call collected ten names at most. Anything past the tenth name is invisible in this cell, which is not the same as being absent.
- Mention rate is the share of samples in this cell where a name came up. It is not market share, and it is not a judgement about the product.
- Read this cell for who is present, not for the order.
Methodology: the panel, the phrasings and how completeness is counted
You can also query this data from Claude, Cursor or another agent, with the same reading rules attached. For agents →